PDA

View Full Version : Scientology - keep reading, serious discussion ahead


SacredSpirit
04-18-2006, 09:50 PM
Just plain creepy

http://www.scientology.org/

Alot of Celebraties and rich people do this religion. My mother says its a new made up religion for rich people who think their special and so they made up it up to be difdferent and stuff.

I personally think its wierd and demonic

For example
Tom Cruise and his wife

We shes having her baby, no one can say anything. It has to be completely quiet. She cant cry out or anything while having the baby.

CRAZY!!!!

lions mane
04-18-2006, 11:22 PM
this isnt a religon its more of a belief if that makes sense!

and do u know that kattie (that crazy girl with that sorry actor) cant see the baby for 7 days (a week) after she gives birth! omg! what the heck kinda birth is that? :eek:

but yes! this is a very stupid (stupid) belief! ya know?

Someonebeatmetowunderkind
04-18-2006, 11:30 PM
They are getting as wierd as Michael Jackson.

lions mane
04-18-2006, 11:33 PM
They are getting as wierd as Michael Jackson.
omg! michael jackson is one of the greatest singers of all time! if not the best! how's he weird? :confused: :eek:

~HoRsEy_gUrL~
04-18-2006, 11:47 PM
Awwww, she can't see the baby for 7 days!!!!!

♣Teh Deviant♣
04-19-2006, 01:01 AM
UGH DONT EVEN MENTION IT! :mad:

but Kaballah is cool though, better than Scientology at least. And lots of famous ppl are doing it.

♣Teh Deviant♣
04-19-2006, 01:02 AM
this isnt a religon its more of a belief if that makes sense!

and do u know that kattie (that crazy girl with that sorry actor) cant see the baby for 7 days (a week) after she gives birth! omg! what the heck kinda birth is that? :eek:

but yes! this is a very stupid (stupid) belief! ya know?

AND she has to go thru labor in SILENCE! :eek: :mad: :( Poor Katie...I never liked her, anyways, but..

DeplorableWord
04-19-2006, 01:21 AM
Uhh, that's wierd!

lions mane
04-19-2006, 03:11 AM
u guys! she just gave birth! the babys name is suri! :eek: poor kid! ya know?

mrstumnus99
04-19-2006, 12:08 PM
Yeah but Apple is worse. At least she's named after one of the lemurs in "Dinosaur"!

king_phiilip
04-19-2006, 12:11 PM
i wonder if tom did this he said he would

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/tm_objectid=16959400&method=full&siteid=66633&headline=cruise--i-ll-eat-my-baby-s-placenta--name_page.html

Rhyanidd
04-19-2006, 12:31 PM
Well if she can't see the baby for 7 days after its born then Breastfeeding is shot to..um...the pits of despair! And dont cry out when she is in labour?!?! that is stuupid! Its a painful process!...Ya know I think TC needs to go through something like that and not be allowed to cry out!

But what do they do if she does cry out?

Elf Of The Grey Havens
04-19-2006, 03:16 PM
This is gonna get locked... Jimmy K's thread did.

Señor Puntos
04-19-2006, 04:03 PM
Scientologists make me sick. Or, in fact, the people who are in the high positions of scientology make me sick.

SacredSpirit
04-19-2006, 09:21 PM
I just read the thing on birth on the website and she can cry out but it has to be quiet they want the baby to come out in a world thats calm and peacful.

theorangejello
04-19-2006, 09:24 PM
actually wanna know whats ironic
brooke shields.. also had a baby girl. lol.
that was like 20in and 20ounches.sumthing like that.

*IOWW the Iasc*
04-19-2006, 09:24 PM
u guys! she just gave birth! the babys name is suri! :eek: poor kid! ya know?

Suri is hebrew for Princess.

Which is strange considering Tom Cruise doesn't believe in God...

I think it's a pretty name...but that poor kid...having to have Tom Cruise as a dad...

xovermyheadx
04-19-2006, 09:30 PM
Suri is hebrew for Princess.

Which is strange considering Tom Cruise doesn't believe in God...

I think it's a pretty name...but that poor kid...having to have Tom Cruise as a dad...

I think its an ugly name
i feel bad for the child!
plus having THEM as parents :mad: :rolleyes:

*IOWW the Iasc*
04-19-2006, 09:33 PM
I think its an ugly name
i feel bad for the child!
plus having THEM as parents :mad: :rolleyes:

Your entitled to the opinion about the name...but I disagree, I think it's pretty.

Actually, you can have your opinion on both...because I know Tom is a head-case, but Katie may not be that bad.
I'm not going to automatically think the kid is gonna have an awful life, because she probably wont.

xovermyheadx
04-19-2006, 09:34 PM
Your entitled to the opinion about the name...but I disagree, I think it's pretty.

Actually, you can have your opinion on both...because I know Tom is a head-case, but Katie may not be that bad.
I'm not going to automatically think the kid is gonna have an awful life, because she probably wont.
Tom does have problems
yeah..the name thing......uck

katie..idk

skandarsgirl411
04-19-2006, 09:42 PM
ya i heard about that too it really sucks for katie!!!!!!!!! lol

Elf Of The Grey Havens
04-19-2006, 09:48 PM
Out of respect for Jimmy K, this thread should really be closed. When he started a thread about Scientology, it got deleted.

lions mane
04-20-2006, 12:19 AM
this thread is more about the crazy people who follow scientology not about the religon/belief itself ya know?

and IOWW do u know that kattie has stop talking to all her long time friends and everything ever sicne she started things up with tom? yah.... i use to like her to cause one of my fave shows of all time is/was dawsons creek! ya know? but ever since she got with that manicac (who i never actually liked, just some of his movies) i just cant stand her no more! ya know?

tgraveline
04-20-2006, 03:13 AM
Well, scientology is supposedly based off the book Battlefield: Earth, which to my knowledge is a science-fiction book, made religious by a few people. I am not sure if the Author even believes in this or not. I do know that the movie was postponed for many years as the producers said noone would see it, well they were right and John Travolta got his way and it got more popular.

I myself find this to be a bit rediculous as a sort of religion, but by definition this is a cult, based on the size of it. Second, from what I know, they go to "church" for a lack of a better term on Sunday. I ask myself why? Because thats when Christians celebrate for their sabbath and other religions do so on other days based on specific reasons. This just settled with Sunday, for lack of a reason and more for convienence. I'm sorry, but for a guy to just make this up and get turned into a religious thing, just seems a bit stupid.

At least all of the other religions have some sort of book, and history to it that doesn't date back to some sort of alien thing, lol. Most of those religions end in mass suicide, scary.

tg

PS on a side-note, Kaballuh was mentioned earlier, and that is a form of Jewish Mysticism, and I must say I wish I came up with the idea of holy drinking water, dang charging five bucks a 20oz bottle is just ingenious, lol. Second, I'm sorry but Brittany Spears is in this apparently and she got some Hebrew writing tattoed somewhere on the back of her neck I believe, and that is one of the oldest Jewish whatever deity taboos. Should check up on your own "religion" before you do something to your body people.

MrBeaver
04-20-2006, 03:26 AM
this isnt a religon its more of a belief Enlighten me as to what the difference is.

This looks to me like a really demented rip of Universism (http://www.universist.org/), which is basically a group of people of any religion who apply skepticism to their beliefs (i.e. - the Bible has been translated and revised multiple times, and is not always told from the same view. How do we know for sure what happened, besides the general picture?) and keep an open mind to others' beliefs and not have "faith" -- as in believing in any one "truth" without any question.

EDIT: Ooh, the new Unviersist site layout hurts my eyes...
DOUBLE EDIT: Hey, where'd the rest of the site go? :(

MrBeaver
04-20-2006, 03:30 AM
omg! michael jackson is one of the greatest singers of all time! if not the best! how's he weird? :confused: :eek: He's a child molester that's addicted to plastic surgery, for one...

Euphrates
04-20-2006, 05:55 AM
Well this has been a pleasantly uplifting, encouraging, educational, and Christ-like discussion. *sarcasm*

Scientology is based on a philosophy espoused by L. Ron Hubbard in the 1950's. If it is based on a writing, which it kinda is, it is based on the Dianetics. He also wrote sci-fi books. It is considered by some to be a cult because there have been accusations of them exploiting their members for money and harassing critics of their organization. Nations such as Germany and France have labelled Scientology a cult. The Church of Scientology has the status of a religion in America.

There's an old cliche about not saying anything if it's not nice, but I think Scripture puts it better: "A man who lacks judgment derides his neighbor, but a man of understanding holds his tongue." Proverbs 11:12

I can't see a good reason to continue with the "Scientology bad" stuff. If that's what you think... fine. But there's no point is starting and continuing a thread that is meant to deride Scientology and gossip. (See: Proverbs 26:20, Romans 1:29-30, 2 Corinthians 12:20)

If you're worried about the family friendly nature of narniafans, you need look no farther than here. This thread should be locked because it serves no useful purpose and is a stumbling block for many.

Naydiss
04-20-2006, 11:53 AM
It really stinks for Katie because she has been raised and grown up a Catholic adn now because she is having a baby with Tom Cruise, she is changing her entire life to evolve around Scientology. I feel bad for her :(

Señor Puntos
04-20-2006, 12:17 PM
Did you know Scientologists try to get college drop-outs who don't know what to do with their lives to go away on boats because they tell them they're actually ancient warriors but they usually end up going crazy and that the whole religion is based on a lie and is a load of crazy lies? :)

inkspot
04-20-2006, 12:49 PM
Out of respect for Jimmy K, this thread should really be closed. When he started a thread about Scientology, it got deleted.
The reason I didn't close this one is: it seemed to be more a little chat about Tom and Katie's baby with a little Scientology thrown in. It wasn't, before page three, masquerading as a real discussion about Scientology.

If you want the Thread to continue, and you want to post something bad about Scientology, please post your documentation and your own reasoning. Don't just say, "Scientology is bad! Scientologists make me sick!"

Actually post some facts about Scientology and explain why you react to these facts the way you do.

Otherwise, just gossip about Tom and Katie and other Scientologists.

The thing is, Scientology is a religion, and it is very disrespectful just to throw out incendiary statements without documentation and without being reasonable. If you can be reasonable and respectful, the Thread can be open. If you just say mean things about Scientology, it will be closed.

Hope this clears things up. :)

Did you know Scientologists try to get college drop-outs who don't know what to do with their lives to go away on boats because they tell them they're actually ancient warriors but they usually end up going crazy and that the whole religion is based on a lie and is a load of crazy lies?
This sentiment may be true, but in order for the discussion to be reasonable, you would be better off to say:

Did you know Scientologists believe humans are actually ancient warriors whose spirits have come to dwell in human bodies? This of course is in contrast to Christian teaching.
:)

WillsGirl
04-20-2006, 12:54 PM
Yeah but Apple is worse. At least she's named after one of the lemurs in "Dinosaur"!
Apple isn't so bad, it's a Biblical name and there's a cute story behind it.

I cannot express my feelings enough about this matter... I went off on a rampage saying how much I hate Tom Cruise... (Which I probably shouldn't have... :rolleyes: ) But you know, all of his scientalogy crap is ridiculous and insulting! He's basically saying that vitamins and excorcise is enough for anybody and there is no such thing as a chemical embalance or depression!
Yeah well, let's see YOUR brother get cancer and THEN come back and say it again YOU IDIOT! :mad:

Okay I'm done.... :o Sorry for ranting here guys...

sylara
04-20-2006, 01:19 PM
[QUOTE=lions mane]this isnt a religon its more of a belief
[QUOTE]

As I'm currently working on an article on Scientology perhaps I can help with a few facts. First, Scientology actually claims to have nothing to do with faith or belief. Rather their philosophy is that whatever is observed by you is true for you. The primary definition as given by www.scientology.org is "Scientology is the study and handling of the spirit in relationship to itself, others and all of life. The religion comprises a body of knowledge extending from certain fundamental truths." One of these 'truths' is that man is a spiritual and immortal being with unlimited capabilities. However, scientologists believe that because man is 'diseased' (for lack of a better term) that he/she has 8 dynamics within life that must be accepted and absorbed before finding complete happiness. These dynamics of the spirit range from the individual to God (merely a supreme being to them).

Another of the rather odd concepts from scientology is the tone scale. The tone scale gives a wide range of emotions and states of mind upon which every individual supposedly falls. The idea is that by looking at the scale and knowing where one person falls on it you can use Scientology to communicate with that person and move yourself up along the scale to what is considered the pinnacle at 40.0 (the supreme state of beingness). One of the methods of finding a person's position on the tone scale is a device called the E-meter. The E-meter (electropsychometer) is controlled by a leader in Scientology who uses it to pick up electronic readings on the individual's mental state.
That is the official word from the scientology website.

Now, one thing it is important to note, Scientology was started by L. Ron Hubbard and most of the ideas came out of a book published in 1950 called "Dianetics: The Modern Science of Mental Health." This book was more specific but eventually led to the modern day version of Scientology.

There have been several controversies over Scientology although as of late the group is steadily growing despite the fact that the majority of Americans view it as a cult religion. (Whether the latest antics of TomKat have anything to do with the American opinion of it I can't say). In 1991, Time Magazine published an article on Scientology entitled "Scientology: The Cult of Greed." The magazine was sued for libel but ended up winning its case. The main reason for the case was for several papers known as The Fishman documents. Steven Fishman, a former scientologist had spoken with Time and provided about 65 pages of information from the church's "Operating Thetan" (the rules of Scientology). The group did ultimately win their case in stating that their documents should remain private. However, it has hurt the public view as access to these documents is only allowed to followers who have proven to be spirtually aware. Coincidentally, it will also cost you tens of thousands of dollars to view these documents. (Hardly a policy that looks good in light of the Time article).

It is also important to note that constant battles are being waged. Much of Europe has found Scientology to be fraudulent and there have been several cases of mistreatment/miseducation of children reported. Many Californian cities have been finding various problems within curricula of Scientology and some of the practices.

Hopefully that provides a little insight. I would be happy to answer as many questions as I can. The more opinions I get in, the better my editor likes me. :)

inkspot
04-20-2006, 02:15 PM
Thanks, Sylara!
What do you know about this theory that all humans are actually reincarnated alien warriors? Is this something Scientologists believe?

sylara
04-20-2006, 04:43 PM
It is a little more complicated than that although no matter how its worded I have to say I still find it extremely disturbing and odd. Having said that, here is my best attempt at objectivity.

In the 3rd level of the Operating Thetan (which I mentioned before) there is a story of Xenu. The story goes that Xenu was an alien who was the head of the Galactic Federation approximately 75 million years ago. (apparently George Lucas wasn't as ahead of his time as he thought ;) ) Supposedly he had a severe overpopulation problem so he created a hydrogen bomb (again, the US is behind the times) and brought the extra 'beings' to this planet where they were blown up and then packaged. The reasons for packaging the remains are unknown by outsiders to the group and will cost you a good sum to find out the answer. However, the general idea is that their spirits were still free and so now our bodies here are infested with these spirits. This is all discovered at level 3 and other members try to help each other get rid of these 'spirits' through mediation and channeling that is supposed to remind them of the time they were blown up.

It is interesting to note that the only other time this information was published outside of official Scientology documents was in an article done by the Washington Post. The paper was sued for "trade secret violations" a very telling case. The group made no efforts to sue for defamation. Their suit simply said that the paper was telling their secrets not that these secrets were false. That suit was a big push in the public eye as to the oddities of Scientology.

I hope that answered your question, Inkspot.

inkspot
04-20-2006, 04:48 PM
Yes, thank you. Very good answer. So, the spirit is like a parasite that we need to get rid of. I thought it was our soul, that we were in effect the revived aliens. But no, you make it more clear: these revived aliens leeching into us are the source of our troubles because they don't belong in us.

I get it. Thank you. :)

sylara
04-20-2006, 04:51 PM
Actually, that's where it gets a little confusing. its supposed to be that they are parasites yet members help each other to rid themselves of the parasites by remembering being blown up. I haven't yet been able to discover whether they have these memories because of the spirits being attached to them or because in the broad spectrum of Scientology beliefs, we are all space beings and so remember them that way. One of my sources for my article has stated that the facts for that are located in the Operating Thetan. Unfortunately, I haven't been able to find any confirmation of it. (If anyone has a spare million dollars around I could get plenty of answers though. :) )

Gryphon
04-20-2006, 08:53 PM
oh my goodness, you people and your celebrity gossip, not everything the media says is true for one thing and also, who cares about what other people do? its not like we can change anything.

anyway, if there is anything these people need its prayer, period, the media is eating them enough as it is. :rolleyes:

sylara
04-20-2006, 09:24 PM
I'm not sure if you're referring to the many posts on the celebrities or the thread as a whole but I haven't been discussing the various celebrities involved at all. I'm currently working on a piece on Scientology in light of its recent popularity and I was attempting to explain it to people. I agree they need prayer but I was hoping to clarify some details on their beliefs for people who were curious.

tgraveline
04-20-2006, 09:32 PM
Very informative sylara, good to know. thanks for the info.

tg

Gryphon
04-20-2006, 10:20 PM
oh, no, its just after Will and Skandar and all that crap im tired of hearing anything having to do with the media in general in reference to alot of things, mostly celebs.

jesusfreak
04-20-2006, 10:47 PM
This a kult and nothing less. Poor Katie is going to have a terrible time. There are also stupid rules that if the Katie is having problems with the delivery she can't take medicine and can't have any metical attention or anything. If this has any complications it is very posible that she could die! So sad.

Even if you don't a religion, doesn't this sound completely bazare and crule to the baby and Katie?????

sylara
04-21-2006, 01:40 PM
Scientology claims that the thetans (which I mentioned above as the alien beings whose spirits supposedly inhabit our beings and for which we use the Operating Thetan as a manual for getting rid of them) attach themselves to a newborn almost instantly. The idea is that silence during the birth, the use of as little anesthesia as possible, and separation of child and mother will keep the number of thetans limited. Supposedly if there is little sound the thetans cannot hear them and if there is little contact the many thetans around the parents won't shift over to the child immediately. Here is an exact quote from Dianetics the book that started it all on silence in birth.
"Maintain silence in the presence of birth to save both the sanity of the mother and the child and safeguard the home to which they will go. And the maintaining of silence does not mean a volley of "Sh's," for those make stammerers."
L. Ron Hubbard, "Dianetics", Chapter X, "Preventive Dianetics", page 193

Again, it certainly is odd and numerous doctors have pointed out the many dangers of this. Babies need that connection to the outside world and many doctors are worried about the effects of Scientologist practices. The one benefit is at the moment they still give birth in hospitals. The fear is if they began to require home births in which the child would truly be alone other than its feedings.

inkspot
04-21-2006, 01:51 PM
Thanks, Sylara. At least this will help people understand why all these procedures were required for Tom and Katie's baby. For whatever we may think of it, Tom and Katie think they are doing what is best for their little one. :)

Nosferatu
04-22-2006, 01:12 AM
Finally I'm back!

Well I saw this scientology discussion and I thought I would join in!


As It has been previously stated Scientology was founded by (One of the greatest Science fiction writers) L Ron Hubbard (OK If I spelt his name incorrectly it's because I'm extremely tired!) And the religion actually started in a Bar where Hubbard was talking to his friends about religion And he stated that religion was dead and that if it was to come back it would be in a science fiction pretense. His friends disagreed with him so Hey decided to write his book. *NOTE* OK The following is speculation stated by various journalists and Articles it is not Necessarily the truth *END NOTE* Years later when scientology was successful It is said that Hubbard was going to come out and say that scientology was merely a experiment and nothing more... A little while later Hubbard disappeared. Now granted scientology today is different then it was back then. Back then it was a horrible terrorist organization and the government had hundreds of busts taking down many of the radicals of scientology. But the rumor is that the scientologists kidnapped Hubbard and kept him in a boat out of American Waters. Ok This is facts I have gained from various news organizations and other documents. So nobody get angry and start throwing their stones! :D

P.S. If anybody find my post hard to read please be gracious because I think I need glasses and again I am extremely tired! :)

Lawrence
04-22-2006, 11:40 AM
Friends,

I would have to agree with the previous poster who stated that Scientology is not a religion. They may have a history, a mythology, etc., but they have no belief in God, simply the "power within" (which got there by some of the most convoluted, science-fiction I have ever read). They supposedly do good work with their Narcanon (helping narcotics addicts), but on balance their ability to pull souls away from God and his Son negates any good work they might do in my humble opinion.

In less enlightened times folks who believed in powers other than those of God (and permitted by God) were treated far less kindly than Tom and Katie, John Travolta, Kirstie Allie, etc. People who talk of "Thetans" and "Xenu" might as well be talking about Asmodeus or Beelzebub, as far as I am concerned.

Pax,
L

Jood
04-22-2006, 10:28 PM
omg! michael jackson is one of the greatest singers of all time! if not the best! how's he weird? :confused: :eek:
HOW IS HE NOT WEIRD!!!!!!!!
HE WAS BORN BLACK!!!!!!
NOW HE'S WHITE!!!
EXPLAIN THAT!!!
HE WAS ON CHILD YOU-KNOW-WHAT-CHARGES!!!!
WEIRDO TO THE MAX...
He's probably gonna turn out to be you-know-what.

Euphrates
04-22-2006, 10:36 PM
There are a number of different skin diseases that could account for his change in skin color. None of which include being "weird". Let's not attack people for things they cannot change.

Again:
"A man who lacks judgment derides his neighbor, but a man of understanding holds his tongue." Proverbs 11:12

Jood
04-22-2006, 10:39 PM
ahhh come one..
We ALL know, or should know, it wasn't a disease, it was chemicals, and surgery, to give him a really weird nose.

lions mane
04-22-2006, 10:42 PM
He's a child molester that's addicted to plastic surgery, for one...
yah, i dunno how off topic this will be but i just saw it and wow!

hes so not a child molestor, and if hes addicted to plastic surgery so what? does that make him a monster? does he lose all credability for that? does that make him crazy?

Euphrates
04-23-2006, 03:37 AM
Michael Jackson if off topic for this thread... but the thread's original title did encourage gossip. And while we're on it: "Judge not, lest ye be judged" Matthew 7:1. I think Christ was right. What do you think?

Basically, keep the unsupported personal attacks to yourself.

Nosferatu
04-23-2006, 08:20 PM
I'm not sure how relivant this is but when Jesus said that it was mean't that don't Judge and condemn someone to a Sin that you yourself are guilty of. Like someone trying someone for adultery when they themselves where adulterers.

Euphrates
04-23-2006, 09:36 PM
"Do not judge, or you too will be judged. For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you." Matthew 7:1-2

This does not only apply to hypocricy.

"Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Luke 6:31

This applies to all actions.

I tell you that there are skin diseases that can cause massive skin color change as seen in Michael Jackson. Dermatologists have testified that Jackson has vitiligo and lupus. Suggestions that his change in skin color is due to chemicals is unsubstantiated rumor. Furthermore, Jackson has never been convicted of child molestation. We should not judge him, or anyone else, in such a manner.

The same is true of Scientologists. Most accusations come from people who are not well informed about the subject and at a place where there are no Scientologists to defend themselves and their philosophy. It is best not to deride our neighbors.

inkspot
04-23-2006, 09:40 PM
Yah, let's stop giving Michael Jackson a hard time. We're just discussing Scientology.

shmeepie
04-23-2006, 09:58 PM
sorry if you guys don't want to hear any more about michael jackson, but i HAD to comment.

what's all these news stories about michael jackson going to court, on charges of what? child molestation!

and skin disease my foot. he got plastic surgery because he was ashamed that he was black.

sorry if i seem too opinionated.

Ephinie
04-24-2006, 03:58 AM
It would be cool if we could get a scientologist on here to give us some "inside information" on it. I was especially interested in what Sylara said about how you have to pay a lot of money before you can learn certain inside things about what they believe. This is typical of most cult's, I believe. They keep a bunch of knowledge about their doctrines secret, reserved for a select few. Therefore, its adherents actually follow a religion that they know very little about, unless they are in this coveted inside circle.

Christianity is not like this now, but it was similar at one time. There used to be a time when very few people could read for themselves, so they had to rely on what they were told by priests and those who could read for themselves. I am so glad those days are over, and there are no secret doctrines or anything like that in Christianity now. Makes things a whole lot better, in my opinion.

inkspot
04-24-2006, 10:57 AM
Agreed. I also thought it was interesting what Sylara said about when the Washington Post published some of those Scientology doctrines, they weren't sued for defamation or libel or something, but for disclosing trade secrets -- as if their secrets are what they sell to keep the business going ... It's quite different from Christianity, where we would be delighted if the Washington Post would publish our plan of salvation through Jesus. We don't want it to be a secret!

Euphrates
04-26-2006, 05:13 AM
sorry if you guys don't want to hear any more about michael jackson, but i HAD to comment.

what's all these news stories about michael jackson going to court, on charges of what? child molestation!

and skin disease my foot. he got plastic surgery because he was ashamed that he was black.

sorry if i seem too opinionated.
You are wrong and your comments are hurtful. I refuse to allow you to have the last word when they are so clearly misguided and mean.

How would you like it if you were accused of something but not convicted and people took the accusation as a sign of guilt? In America we have this thing called the presumption of innocence. It's a good idea. Michael Jackson has never been convicted of child molestation. You would be wise to keep that in mind.

How can plastic surgery change someone from being black to being white? And what chemical do you think he used? Any evidence? I tell you there is expert testimony that accounts for his skin change due to diseases, but all you say in response is "skin disease my foot". Good one.

It's not that you are too opinionated, but you are making wild accusations against a real person with real feelings and a real soul. Your accusations are unsupported and hurtful. You need to stop.

inkspot
04-26-2006, 01:05 PM
Is Michael Jackson a Scientologist? I thought his family was Jehovahs Witness or something. Because Scientology has a lot of rich and famous patrons, it's hard to keep this discussion from centering on their eccentricities rather than their faith. But we should let Michael Jackson alone for now, okay? He is the King of Pop, dances great, and had a lot of good songs back in the day. I am sorry for his misfortunes now and hope he finds spiritual hope for eternity.

Now, back to the discussion, if anyone has anything else on the religion rather than the celebrities ... I wish one of our members was a Scientologist and could explain it.

LifeMaiden
05-02-2006, 01:39 AM
Michael Jackson is a Jehovah's Witness.



I belonged to Scientology for about a year back in 1990. I have to tell you guys from my own personal experience that it was both positive and negative, but MORE negative. I'll tell you what really spoiled it for me. There was a book that was written and published in Canada about L RON HUBBARD, the founder of scientology, and about his several children and his wife. I remember that I kept asking questions about where his wife and kids were, and the answers I received were always evasive.

Some of the teachings were sensible and practical but nowhere near being worth what scientology charged in relation to the services. You could go to a therapist for so much less, or even better, talk to your friends and loved ones for FREE. It costs about 40,000 dollars ( and that was back in 1990) to reach what they call a state of CLEAR, meaning that your mind has been cleared of past problems and past influences that may have troubled you, and you are ready to move on to what they call OT, meaning operating THETA, or being able to operate on a highly spiritual level. There are eight operating theta levels. To reach level eight you'd have to spend at least a hundred thousand dollars, all of which are considered church 'donations'.

I was given this book to read, banned by scientologists for obvious reasons, by an ex scientologist himself. It discussed the hypocriticial lifestyle L Ron Hubbard lived.

I never fully immersed myself into this group because somehow, down deep inside, I felt they were more cultlike than anything else. I only went through a few stages before I quit. After I quit they sent people to my parents' house, and called many, many times. I got the feelng they were spying on me. It was frightening to think about at the time.

I asked a lot of questions while I was a member at this one center where I lived. Too many questions which were never answered which made me suspicious. The emphasis on clean living was ruined by nearly all the members smoking. When I asked them why they chose to do something as unhealthy as smoking, the answer was almost always the same from every member who smoked...because the body was meaningless and the 'theta', or 'soul' . That's an interesting hypocritical viewpoint...to try to emphasize healthy living and then ruin it by smoking two packs a day. L Ron Hubbard himself was a chain smoker.



There was an emphasis on holistic medicine and a more natural approach to treating illnesses, with the belief that most illness came from something emotional or something that you were withholding emotionally....( and avoiding doctors like the plague which could be deadly), vitamin consumption, and a process of sauna and body cleansing to rid the body of toxins...it was said you could experience past lives through this. I, unfortunately, did not. There is also a huge cruise ship that cruises around the oceans, never docking, which is run by highly trained scientologists

I personally believe from reading the book on L RON HUBBARD that like many people, he simply used his views as a way to obtain money. What else is new? His wife is supposedly in prison because of income tax evasion. There was a HUGE emphasis on the fact that psychology and psychiatry were evil and bad...and all anti depressants were just soul killers.

I'm just glad I didn't continue on with this!!

Ephinie
05-02-2006, 07:02 AM
Michael Jackson is a Jehovah's Witness.



I belonged to Scientology for about a year back in 1990. I have to tell you guys from my own personal experience that it was both positive and negative, but MORE negative. I'll tell you what really spoiled it for me. There was a book that was written and published in Canada about L RON HUBBARD, the founder of scientology, and about his several children and his wife. I remember that I kept asking questions about where his wife and kids were, and the answers I received were always evasive.

So... how did you become involved with scientology? Did they come to your door and do the evangelism thing, or did you come into contact with them through some other medium? Also, you mention lower down in this post about his wife being in prison, but did you ever manage to find out anything about his children?


Some of the teachings were sensible and practical but nowhere near being worth what scientology charged in relation to the services. You could go to a therapist for so much less, or even better, talk to your friends and loved ones for FREE. It costs about 40,000 dollars ( and that was back in 1990) to reach what they call a state of CLEAR, meaning that your mind has been cleared of past problems and past influences that may have troubled you, and you are ready to move on to what they call OT, meaning operating THETA, or being able to operate on a highly spiritual level. There are eight operating theta levels. To reach level eight you'd have to spend at least a hundred thousand dollars, all of which are considered church 'donations'.


I'm curious... what specific "steps" or practises do you they lead you through in order to get to this state of "CLEAR." And when you get to the highest theta level, do you get some sort of special prize or something? Did you know anyone personally who had reached either, "clear" or one of those higher operating levels; and if you did, did you notice any marked difference in their personalities, satisfaction with life in general, and whether or not they really did seem better off?

I was given this book to read, banned by scientologists for obvious reasons, by an ex scientologist himself. It discussed the hypocriticial lifestyle L Ron Hubbard lived.


Could you tell me the title and author of the book, please? It sounds like something I might want to read...

I never fully immersed myself into this group because somehow, down deep inside, I felt they were more cultlike than anything else. I only went through a few stages before I quit. After I quit they sent people to my parents' house, and called many, many times. I got the feelng they were spying on me. It was frightening to think about at the time.


That isn't uncommon behavior, I think, when dealing with cults. You're lucky they didn't try to knock you off or harm your pets or anything wierd and psycho like that. Maybe they're too high profile to engage in hard-core stalking and threatening. But I'm glad you seem to have gotten through all that now.


I asked a lot of questions while I was a member at this one center where I lived. Too many questions which were never answered which made me suspicious. The emphasis on clean living was ruined by nearly all the members smoking. When I asked them why they chose to do something as unhealthy as smoking, the answer was almost always the same from every member who smoked...because the body was meaningless and the 'theta', or 'soul' . That's an interesting hypocritical viewpoint...to try to emphasize healthy living and then ruin it by smoking two packs a day. L Ron Hubbard himself was a chain smoker.

There was an emphasis on holistic medicine and a more natural approach to treating illnesses, with the belief that most illness came from something emotional or something that you were withholding emotionally....( and avoiding doctors like the plague which could be deadly), vitamin consumption, and a process of sauna and body cleansing to rid the body of toxins...it was said you could experience past lives through this. I, unfortunately, did not. There is also a huge cruise ship that cruises around the oceans, never docking, which is run by highly trained scientologists


Interesting that they would be all right with smoking because they were concerned about the "soul" while also condemning medicine and doctors in favor of natural remedies. So in one breath, they say the body doesn't matter; and in the next, they condemn doctors because they aren't good for the body. Or something. It's a bit confusing, isn't it? Also... I'm interest in this cruise ship. What is the purpose of this ship? Where does it go? Who gets to go aboard and for how long? What do they DO on it?

I personally believe from reading the book on L RON HUBBARD that like many people, he simply used his views as a way to obtain money. What else is new? His wife is supposedly in prison because of income tax evasion. There was a HUGE emphasis on the fact that psychology and psychiatry were evil and bad...and all anti depressants were just soul killers.

I'm just glad I didn't continue on with this!!

I'm glad you didn't continue with this, either! I am incredibly curious about this Scientology stuff, and I admit that I do not know very much about it at all. Yet, based solely on what I HAVE seen of it thus far, I get the impression that it is not good or healthy.

Also, I am curious about this, if you or anyone else knows the answer... How do Scientologists view Christianity? I know there are some cults or pop fads or other religions that teach people you can be both Christian and what they are. Is this a view that Scientology takes, or do they have a different stance on it?

LifeMaiden
05-02-2006, 07:05 AM
I'm off to bed now but will tell you in greater detail and depth about this so-called religious cult. They considered themselves a religion with LRON HUBBARD as a god of sorts...and so on. There is much to discuss here. That's why I love this site!!

Ephinie
05-02-2006, 07:08 AM
I'm off to bed now but will tell you in greater detail and depth about this so-called religious cult. They considered themselves a religion with LRON HUBBARD as a god of sorts...and so on. There is much to discuss here. That's why I love this site!!

Goodnight! I look forward to reading what you have to say about it all.

LifeMaiden
05-02-2006, 09:58 AM
So... how did you become involved with scientology? Did they come to your door and do the evangelism thing, or did you come into contact with them through some other medium? Also, you mention lower down in this post about his wife being in prison, but did you ever manage to find out anything about his children?



I'm curious... what specific "steps" or practises do you they lead you through in order to get to this state of "CLEAR." And when you get to the highest theta level, do you get some sort of special prize or something? Did you know anyone personally who had reached either, "clear" or one of those higher operating levels; and if you did, did you notice any marked difference in their personalities, satisfaction with life in general, and whether or not they really did seem better off?



Could you tell me the title and author of the book, please? It sounds like something I might want to read...



That isn't uncommon behavior, I think, when dealing with cults. You're lucky they didn't try to knock you off or harm your pets or anything wierd and psycho like that. Maybe they're too high profile to engage in hard-core stalking and threatening. But I'm glad you seem to have gotten through all that now.



Interesting that they would be all right with smoking because they were concerned about the "soul" while also condemning medicine and doctors in favor of natural remedies. So in one breath, they say the body doesn't matter; and in the next, they condemn doctors because they aren't good for the body. Or something. It's a bit confusing, isn't it? Also... I'm interest in this cruise ship. What is the purpose of this ship? Where does it go? Who gets to go aboard and for how long? What do they DO on it?



Also, I am curious about this, if you or anyone else knows the answer... How do Scientologists view Christianity? I know there are some cults or pop fads or other religions that teach people you can be both Christian and what they are. Is this a view that Scientology takes, or do they have a different stance on it?



I tried to sleep but hehe...got carried away by ebay bids on Narnia goodies and then lay down but tossed and turned so here I am. I have to go train someone in the gym at 11am so I have time to get some sleep before then.

First let me say that the book I read is not available anywhere in the US. Scientologist 'spies' ( that's the only word I can think of) have made sure copies which find their way into the states are destroyed. The book was a bestseller in Canada which exposed the fraud and hypocrisy of the man who founded this religion. I only obtained the book very secretively from someone who was a former scientologist who had found a copy of the book in a used bookstore there in Vancouver. I never asked him any more details about it. I read it in its entirety at his house, because God forbid what might have happened if the scientology group found it at my house.

I think they would have said it was all lies anyways, but there were some things that stood out to me, like the vast amounts of money LRH was getting andn hiding, his big fortress-like compound he built, his controlling ways with his wife and philandering, and how no one EVER talked about his wife at the scientology center I was at. After reading that she was in federal prison, I casually asked them where they thought she was, and their response was , " She's around somewhere.'


Now, the ship is composed of these people who are highly trained scientologists who have made it to the very top of the ladder, the Operating Theta 8 level. Basically, you work your way up this very long ladder as you get rid of psychic and emotional baggage. That could be a lot of stuff. Counseling sessions as I mentioned could cost thousands upon thousands. But their justification for it was that NO COST WAS MORE IMPORTANT than the freedom of your true self...your body was just a shell, your TRUE SELF was your THETA, or your immortality.

They never spoke of Christianity in degrading ways, but they definitely didn't see Christ as the Messiah. LRon Hubbard was the Messiah, and religious dogma of the western sort ( Islam, Christianity, Judaism) was not frowned on but they seemed to take more of a 'Eastern' way of things...the belief in many past lives and reincarnation, the idea of astral projection or the soul leaving the body. There was also the belief in alien life forms and so forth.

There were about 40 different states of being that I can remember which preceded its way to CLEAR. 40 positive states above the number 0, and 40 negative states below it.

I have to admit that this chart was very organized and sort of your way of charting how far you were going up the emotional scale. These scales were called TONES. For example, if you were a drunk and a down and out street person lying on the ground, you would be -40 tone, meaning all the way at the bottom. If you were a so-so person with moods, you'd be at tone 4, above the 0.

The goal was to then get to the top positive 40 tone which then was CLEAR.


CLEAR was achieved in therapy, intense, brutal therapy sessions which could take 8 hours sometimes. You had to hold on to these two metal cans attached with a wire to a machine called an E METER, which measured electrical impulses when you were angry, disturbed, or telling a lie. To ME, it was more of a lie detector because if you were withholding something painful they wouldn't let you out of the session til your E METER read positive or 0. The needle would be at middle position when you started. It was a strange machine, and when I asked what it really was, no one answered me.

The next step after the initial ten or so therapy sessions was to then go into the sauna cleansing process which was very extreme. I felt it was damaging to your health. This is where the scientologists were the most hypocritical. They'd want you to clean out toxins EVEN FROM YOUR PAST LIVES haha...but then they'd all smoke. THEY WERE DEAD SET AGAINST DRUGS however, and yet, the hypocisy was ...NICOTINE IS A DRUG and can be more if not so destructive in the long run than marijuana or cocaine...neither of which cause CANCER.


My sauna experience however was what got me interested in exercise physiology and I have to say the one positive thing scientology did was to get my butt in shape. For ten days, we had to run a mile or two, and then get into the sauna for 4-6 hours, taking a few breaks, drinking water, and downing bottles of vitamins, SPECIFICALLY NIACIN, a supplement that was supposed to make you flush out toxins. I felt like puking every time I went in there. I had to do this ten days in a row until I felt all my toxins from my blood, from every drug, from everything negative in my body was gone.

The next process ( I came NOWHERE near to CLEAR as there were, I believe about a dozen more steps and the cost was 35,000) was effective communication, teaching you to avoid your emotions. This is where I really started to see some of these people were like robots, like mere shells of themselves. If you asked a question, everyone seemed to give the same answer, as if somewhere, they had it drilled in their heads that you could not variate from giving different answers. I didn't like that. You're not human if you learn not to have emotions other than being a smiling shell all the time.

For example, that's what I call cultlike. There was no room for differences, no room for questioning. Unanswered questions were everywhere in my mind and I got yelled and screamed at from the top lady at my scientology center for it. All the so called therapy sessions were really CONFESSIONS, and I felt that stupid E METER thing was there to make sure we told all our dark secrets. Otherwise we couldn't leave the room. The counselor was the one who had the E Meter so you never could see what it was doing.


CLEAR then was a stage reached by intensive counseling or therapy for the soul, and beyond that, you became a fully operating THETA up to 8 levels. These people were considered like superhuman robots to me ...they never got sick, never showed their emotions, just smiled happily and maddeningly and acting in charge all the while believing their souls were at the top of the human heap. They believed their souls could leave their bodies at any time.

The ship no one knew about it unless I read it in that book on LRH. They were military style uniforms which depict their rank of Operating Theta 1, all the way to Operating Theta 8. They run a ship that trains scientologists who one day will also be these robots on the ship...it's the scariest thing to me, this ship which floats around, has another ship come to meet it for supplies and food... It was like a cult on a boat.


I have to say that I did notice remarkable changes in my physical body but that was because of the running and the sauna cleasning out the toxins. It was very extreme to do this but it motivated me to pursue a fitness career after I became so adept at running. I also learned to communicate better and more directly without distractions.

What's scary is they lie about LRH, about his wife, and about all the money they charge that was going to him. The books he wrote were a joke...those books on science fiction or whatever...scientologists, armed with tons of money, would buy the books THEMSELVES by the bulk to make it look like LRH was a best selling author.

LIES, LIES, LIES!

They didn't try anything more with me once I left...I just simply had had enough. And I didn't have 40000 at the time neither would I have had the hundred THOUSAND dollars it would have taken to make me a totally operating THETAN. I am a very strong willed, outspoken person who is afraid of NO ONE, NO MAN, NO WOMAN. and I let it be known if they continued to harass me in any way, I would get my cousin, a prominent attorney, to do battle with them .

inkspot
05-02-2006, 12:29 PM
Wow, IceMaiden! Thanks for sharing. This is very interesting from someone who has been on the "inside."

The people in the islands know about the cruise ship, The FreeWinds, because it does dock, in Curacao and the small island of Bonaire. I lived on Bonaire, and this is where I first came in contact with Scientology. Very occasionally, someone would come off the cruise ship and go scuba diving with me. They were nice people (they were cruisers, not the staff, they were students, not teachers as it were) but they never could tell me much about their faith. One of them did give me the Hubbard book "Dianetics," which I thought was odd, to say the least.

When Tom Cruise comes to FreeWinds for classes, he rents another yacht and ties up with the cruise ship -- I don't know if he goes to classes with the other students or has private ones. I do know he goes scuba diving with his own guides, not local people. Which most people with yachts do have their own dive guides aboard.

These days, some of the students leave the ship to shop and dive on Bonaire.

LifeMaiden
05-02-2006, 05:00 PM
I think for me, the scariest thing was seeing some of the people who were deeply involved think and act like robots...they had similiar answers for everything, because they were trained ( so to speak) to say the same things. To me, being an emotional person is NOT a bad thing, and I'd rather have a few problems than become an empty shell, which more than a few scientologists at my center resembled. It was as if they were hollowed out inside.

Ephinie
05-03-2006, 08:15 AM
Wow, thank you for all the detailed information, Icemaiden! It has been very informative.

First let me say that the book I read is not available anywhere in the US. Scientologist 'spies' ( that's the only word I can think of) have made sure copies which find their way into the states are destroyed. The book was a bestseller in Canada which exposed the fraud and hypocrisy of the man who founded this religion. I only obtained the book very secretively from someone who was a former scientologist who had found a copy of the book in a used bookstore there in Vancouver. I never asked him any more details about it. I read it in its entirety at his house, because God forbid what might have happened if the scientology group found it at my house.

So you're saying that since you read it in his house, and it's been a while, you don't remember the title and author of the book? Because I can get a hold of it, even if it isn't available in the US. All I need is the author and title.

I think they would have said it was all lies anyways, but there were some things that stood out to me, like the vast amounts of money LRH was getting andn hiding, his big fortress-like compound he built, his controlling ways with his wife and philandering, and how no one EVER talked about his wife at the scientology center I was at. After reading that she was in federal prison, I casually asked them where they thought she was, and their response was , " She's around somewhere.'

I suppose, to be charitable, that it could be possible the specific people at your center did not know. In that case, "She's around somewhere," would be a valid answer. But they should have said that they don't know, I think. What would have made it REALLY interesting would be to look her up and show them evidence of her being in Federal prison, and see what they make of that. I think that the names of who is in what Federal prison and for what crime are a matter of public records, so long as you know how and where to look. But I could be wrong.

Ephinie
05-03-2006, 08:16 AM
Now, the ship is composed of these people who are highly trained scientologists who have made it to the very top of the ladder, the Operating Theta 8 level. Basically, you work your way up this very long ladder as you get rid of psychic and emotional baggage. That could be a lot of stuff. Counseling sessions as I mentioned could cost thousands upon thousands. But their justification for it was that NO COST WAS MORE IMPORTANT than the freedom of your true self...your body was just a shell, your TRUE SELF was your THETA, or your immortality.

So then... based on this and Inkspot's post, the ship is like a huge travelling classroom where scientologists who have reached a certain operating level go to be further indoctrinated. Am I correct, or does it have some other specific purpose?[/QUOTE]

They never spoke of Christianity in degrading ways, but they definitely didn't see Christ as the Messiah. LRon Hubbard was the Messiah, and religious dogma of the western sort ( Islam, Christianity, Judaism) was not frowned on but they seemed to take more of a 'Eastern' way of things...the belief in many past lives and reincarnation, the idea of astral projection or the soul leaving the body. There was also the belief in alien life forms and so forth.

I guess what I was really asking was whether or not they specifically condemned other religions as being wrong. Would they allow that one could be a practising Christian and go to church every week, yet also be working their way up the tone scale as a scientologist? Would a scientologist, at some point, be asked to give up their former religion altogether in favor of being completely dedicated to their new way of life?

There were about 40 different states of being that I can remember which preceded its way to CLEAR. 40 positive states above the number 0, and 40 negative states below it.

Is this scale something that L Ron Hubbard specifically devised himself, or is it something that scientologists, as a group, have come up with over time?

I have to admit that this chart was very organized and sort of your way of charting how far you were going up the emotional scale. These scales were called TONES. For example, if you were a drunk and a down and out street person lying on the ground, you would be -40 tone, meaning all the way at the bottom. If you were a so-so person with moods, you'd be at tone 4, above the 0.

The goal was to then get to the top positive 40 tone which then was CLEAR.

It does sound highly organized. If nothing else, I guess we can give LRH and his followers a thumbs up for putting a lot of thought and effort into devising what they have invented.

CLEAR was achieved in therapy, intense, brutal therapy sessions which could take 8 hours sometimes. You had to hold on to these two metal cans attached with a wire to a machine called an E METER, which measured electrical impulses when you were angry, disturbed, or telling a lie. To ME, it was more of a lie detector because if you were withholding something painful they wouldn't let you out of the session til your E METER read positive or 0. The needle would be at middle position when you started. It was a strange machine, and when I asked what it really was, no one answered me.

That entire scenario, to me, is utterly frightening. But when they say that they would not let you out until they were satisfied, is that to say that they would not concede to you that you were finished with that step; or does it mean that they physically, against your will, held you there until they were satisfied?

The next step after the initial ten or so therapy sessions was to then go into the sauna cleansing process which was very extreme. I felt it was damaging to your health. This is where the scientologists were the most hypocritical. They'd want you to clean out toxins EVEN FROM YOUR PAST LIVES haha...but then they'd all smoke. THEY WERE DEAD SET AGAINST DRUGS however, and yet, the hypocisy was ...NICOTINE IS A DRUG and can be more if not so destructive in the long run than marijuana or cocaine...neither of which cause CANCER.

Did they ever address, specifically, why they seemed to regard nicotine as something different than a drug? This view point has absolutely no basis in any logic that I can make out.


My sauna experience however was what got me interested in exercise physiology and I have to say the one positive thing scientology did was to get my butt in shape. For ten days, we had to run a mile or two, and then get into the sauna for 4-6 hours, taking a few breaks, drinking water, and downing bottles of vitamins, SPECIFICALLY NIACIN, a supplement that was supposed to make you flush out toxins. I felt like puking every time I went in there. I had to do this ten days in a row until I felt all my toxins from my blood, from every drug, from everything negative in my body was gone.

I'm glad that you were able to gain something positive from the experience, in spite of the crap that you had to put up with along the way.

The next process ( I came NOWHERE near to CLEAR as there were, I believe about a dozen more steps and the cost was 35,000) was effective communication, teaching you to avoid your emotions. This is where I really started to see some of these people were like robots, like mere shells of themselves. If you asked a question, everyone seemed to give the same answer, as if somewhere, they had it drilled in their heads that you could not variate from giving different answers. I didn't like that. You're not human if you learn not to have emotions other than being a smiling shell all the time.

That's an interesting thing you said... teaching you to avoid your emotions. I find it odd that a group that placed emphasis on emotional health would teach people how to avoid emotions. Perhaps, to them, emotional health is the absence thereof.

For example, that's what I call cultlike. There was no room for differences, no room for questioning. Unanswered questions were everywhere in my mind and I got yelled and screamed at from the top lady at my scientology center for it. All the so called therapy sessions were really CONFESSIONS, and I felt that stupid E METER thing was there to make sure we told all our dark secrets. Otherwise we couldn't leave the room. The counselor was the one who had the E Meter so you never could see what it was doing.
I agree. That is EXACTLY how cults behave.

CLEAR then was a stage reached by intensive counseling or therapy for the soul, and beyond that, you became a fully operating THETA up to 8 levels. These people were considered like superhuman robots to me ...they never got sick, never showed their emotions, just smiled happily and maddeningly and acting in charge all the while believing their souls were at the top of the human heap. They believed their souls could leave their bodies at any time.

Didn't you say, in a previous post, that scientologists are very against counseling or psychiatry of any kind? So then they go and make you do therapy. That makes perfect sense. It sounds like what they really want to do is keep your mind away from any outside influence that could mess with the intense psychological conditioning that seems to be going on. And that second part... just sounds... strange.

The ship no one knew about it unless I read it in that book on LRH. They were military style uniforms which depict their rank of Operating Theta 1, all the way to Operating Theta 8. They run a ship that trains scientologists who one day will also be these robots on the ship...it's the scariest thing to me, this ship which floats around, has another ship come to meet it for supplies and food... It was like a cult on a boat.
So... is the ship run and operated by Theta's of level 8, and used to teach and train lower level theta's who are working their way up? Or do they allow people who have not yet achieved clear to come aboard and learn?


I have to say that I did notice remarkable changes in my physical body but that was because of the running and the sauna cleasning out the toxins. It was very extreme to do this but it motivated me to pursue a fitness career after I became so adept at running. I also learned to communicate better and more directly without distractions.

What's scary is they lie about LRH, about his wife, and about all the money they charge that was going to him. The books he wrote were a joke...those books on science fiction or whatever...scientologists, armed with tons of money, would buy the books THEMSELVES by the bulk to make it look like LRH was a best selling author.

LIES, LIES, LIES!

They didn't try anything more with me once I left...I just simply had had enough. And I didn't have 40000 at the time neither would I have had the hundred THOUSAND dollars it would have taken to make me a totally operating THETAN. I am a very strong willed, outspoken person who is afraid of NO ONE, NO MAN, NO WOMAN. and I let it be known if they continued to harass me in any way, I would get my cousin, a prominent attorney, to do battle with them .

It's good that you are strong-willed and will not be intimidated by anyone. I shudder to think of what kind of experiences a weak-willing, easily manipulated person would go through regarding Scientology. Thank you very much for sharing all of your input on this. It has been incredibly enlightening

LifeMaiden
05-07-2006, 11:00 PM
So then... based on this and Inkspot's post, the ship is like a huge travelling classroom where scientologists who have reached a certain operating level go to be further indoctrinated. Am I correct, or does it have some other specific purpose?

There is no further doctrination past the Operating Theta Level 8. That really was a strange idea...that you couldn't really go past that level because it meant you were the highest, most capable human being...almost superhuman in a way. Yet, what made me question this idea of reaching a certain set point was that to ME, anyways, humans ALWAYS have the potential to grow and learn every day, no matter how accomplished they are, no matter how spiritual they are. There is no limit to me on how someone can grow as a person. The boat seemed to me like a sort of odd pseudo-naval thing. They did train other scientologists how to give therapy sessions, use the E meter, and so forth. It was the most isolated and stringent of all the scientology 'centers'.



2.I guess what I was really asking was whether or not they specifically condemned other religions as being wrong. Would they allow that one could be a practising Christian and go to church every week, yet also be working their way up the tone scale as a scientologist? Would a scientologist, at some point, be asked to give up their former religion altogether in favor of being completely dedicated to their new way of life?

ANSWER: No they didn't condemn other religions as being wrong. It would be hard to be Christian and be a member, though, because many of the ideas in scientology went against Christian teaching, such as being able to experience astral projection, one's soul leaving the body. At the center I was at I noticed a large number of Hindu and Buddhist practioners, because those faiths believe in reincarnation, and mysticism, which seems a little more fitting with LRon Hubbard's ideas.

3.Is this scale something that L Ron Hubbard specifically devised himself, or is it something that scientologists, as a group, have come up with over time?

ANSWER: Yes, the scale is something LRH came up with...it was very very detailed and elaborate...when people would be in a bad mood, for example, the words they would say would be, " I'm on tone level 8..." which might be the level of annoyance. EMOTIONS, in other words, were called TONES, like the tones on a scale of the piano.




4.That entire scenario, to me, is utterly frightening. But when they say that they would not let you out until they were satisfied, is that to say that they would not concede to you that you were finished with that step; or does it mean that they physically, against your will, held you there until they were satisfied?


ANSWER: They wouldn't physically let me leave the room until the E meter registered that my emotions for that time being were 'clear', and I had gotten everything off my chest. The premise was that your emotions had electrical impulse, so the best way to tell you what the E meter was, in my opinion , was to say that it measured your emotions like a lie detector. If you had something on your chest, that meter would read like one of those PG and E meters you have at your house.



5. Did they ever address, specifically, why they seemed to regard nicotine as something different than a drug? This view point has absolutely no basis in any logic that I can make out.

ANSWER: And that was actually one of the things I began to really get annoyed with and suspicious of. No one can tell me they're trying to go get clean physically without quitting smoking. Smoking isn't like doing cocaine or heroin everyday, but in the long run, it will blacken your lungs and kill you. I even showed up one day with a photo of a seriously damaged lung from a chronic smoker, and you know what the head of the center told me? He told me he was sure that wouldn't happen to a scientologist.




6.I'm glad that you were able to gain something positive from the experience, in spite of the crap that you had to put up with along the way.

ANSWER: Well, it's like I said, I try to see everything in a good light. I did feel my communication skills verbally were reinforced, and I did like some of the ideas they had for business organization and for production in the work place. That was their main strength.


7. That's an interesting thing you said... teaching you to avoid your emotions. I find it odd that a group that placed emphasis on emotional health would teach people how to avoid emotions. Perhaps, to them, emotional health is the absence thereof.


ANSWER: Well, I'm a very emotional person by nature, and maybe I should have said that they emphasized a certain ZEN thing..you know how in Buddhism, there's this thing called ZEN, where you radiate a certain calmness that's supposed to be peaceful. But to me I just can't see any human doing that ALL THE TIME.




8. Didn't you say, in a previous post, that scientologists are very against counseling or psychiatry of any kind? So then they go and make you do therapy. That makes perfect sense. It sounds like what they really want to do is keep your mind away from any outside influence that could mess with the intense psychological conditioning that seems to be going on. And that second part... just sounds... strange.

ANSWER: they were strictly against psychiatry in particular because of the use of antidepressants and shock therapy. I can see their viewpoint because things that psychiatry have done in asylums and therapy...well, I don't always agree with them either. Electroshock therapy was brutal and damaged brains. Lobotomies are despicable. But I do believe that there are people who need chemical intervention with the use of medication. They were against PSYCHOLOGY because they felt its premise, based on Jung and Freud, were largely outdated and outmoded for the modern world.

But yet, the main background of scientology was ALL ABOUT THERAPY...hours and hours of it, in a room with a trained scientology who wrote nearly everything you said down on paper and used that E meter thing.



9.So... is the ship run and operated by Theta's of level 8, and used to teach and train lower level theta's who are working their way up? Or do they allow people who have not yet achieved clear to come aboard and learn?

ANSWER: I am not sure about that, but I think you needed to be CLEAR in order to get on that ship.


10. It's good that you are strong-willed and will not be intimidated by anyone. I shudder to think of what kind of experiences a weak-willing, easily manipulated person would go through regarding Scientology. Thank you very much for sharing all of your input on this. It has been incredibly enlightening.


ANSWER: They took advantage I felt of people who suffered from loss. I had a close friend who lost her favorite aunt, and immediately after that, she became very deeply involved in scientology and I truly felt they used her grief to get her to spend more and more money. I believe that they are a cult, and that they used several deviant methods to achieve their means. I didn't like the secretive nature they had on many issues, or how they avoided answering my many questions. My feeling is if they can't or won't answer questions what are they trying to hide?

dude
06-14-2006, 06:31 AM
Just plain creepy
We shes having her baby, no one can say anything. It has to be completely quiet. She cant cry out or anything while having the baby.
This is just misinformation.

inkspot
06-14-2006, 08:38 AM
According to L Ron Hubbard's book Dianetics, a completely silent birth is essential to the future health and well-being of the baby. He is the founder of Scientology, so I assume this practice could be part of their church/organization.

dude
06-14-2006, 09:17 AM
According to L Ron Hubbard's book Dianetics, a completely silent birth is essential to the future health and well-being of the baby. He is the founder of Scientology, so I assume this practice could be part of their church/organization.
A quiet birth is good for a child. But (from http://faq.scientology.org.uk/news/quietbirth.htm ):

Does this mean that a mother cannot scream or moan at all?

Of course they can make noises — the point of silent birth is NO WORDS. This is a principle of Dianetics and to fully understand why, read the book Dianetics the Modern Science of Mental Health, by L. Ron Hubbard. It is words that are the culprit. Outside of not speaking, the objective is generally to have as peaceful and relaxing an environment as possible for the mother and child. It is doubtful that any woman could give birth without making any noise at all.

Mothers naturally want to give their baby the best possible start in life and thus keep the birth as quiet as possible.

Does the application of these principles preclude a mother from using medicines?

The Church has no policy against the use of medicines to help a person with a physical situation. This, too, is up to the mother and her doctor.

Ephinie
06-14-2006, 09:19 AM
dude, are you by any chance a Scientologist?

dude
06-14-2006, 09:24 AM
Yes. I sure am!

Ephinie
06-14-2006, 09:26 AM
Yes. I sure am!
YAY! *clings to you* We've been waiting for a real scientologist to show up ever since this thread started! IceMaiden used to be into scientology, so she sure helped a lot. But it's always a bonus to have a current one around to tell us stuff. :)

dude
06-14-2006, 09:36 AM
Thanks - it's a fascinating and useful subject! I was an atheist until two and a half years ago. I've only been in Scientology 2 years but I have read and listened to a lot of LRH's work and am nearly "Clear".

Ephinie
06-14-2006, 09:41 AM
How much longer do you think it will take you to reach that "clear" state? I am not sure how much of this thread you have read, but do you have any insight to add to what we have already discussed?

dude
06-14-2006, 09:48 AM
About 40 hours - though that will take me a few months to fit into my schedule!

I'm not that interested in defending Scientology. In my opinon it's like defending Mother Teresa against people calling her a paedophile (although that's quite an extreme example! :) )It's often pretty difficult to talk about though because people have fixed ideas on the subject. It's often easier to talk about the evidence for us being spiritual beings outside of Scientology because that's often a bit less emotionally charged yet there are many issues that come up which are relevant to Scientology too.

But if someone seems genuinely interested in understanding my point of view I'll answer any of their questions. Critical analysis is useful once you understand something but criticising something before you understand it just prevents you from understanding.

Basically for me I had become convinced based on my research that we are spiritual beings but couldn't find anyway to understand exactly what our nature is. When I found good answers to that from a Scientologist and heard it could help me get proof of my immortality I figured it was worth investigating.

Ephinie
06-15-2006, 02:20 PM
Dude, I was wondering how long you've been a scientologist and if anyone else in your family are scientologists as well. There are some religions, like the Mormons for example, who place a very high value on healthy family relationships and family values. Do you find that Scientology is very family-oriented or more single-person oriented?

QA48
06-15-2006, 03:09 PM
About 40 hours - though that will take me a few months to fit into my schedule!

I'm not that interested in defending Scientology. In my opinon it's like defending Mother Teresa against people calling her a paedophile (although that's quite an extreme example! :) )It's often pretty difficult to talk about though because people have fixed ideas on the subject. It's often easier to talk about the evidence for us being spiritual beings outside of Scientology because that's often a bit less emotionally charged yet there are many issues that come up which are relevant to Scientology too.

But if someone seems genuinely interested in understanding my point of view I'll answer any of their questions. Critical analysis is useful once you understand something but criticising something before you understand it just prevents you from understanding.

Basically for me I had become convinced based on my research that we are spiritual beings but couldn't find anyway to understand exactly what our nature is. When I found good answers to that from a Scientologist and heard it could help me get proof of my immortality I figured it was worth investigating.

Tom Cruise should hang out with you more often ;)

LifeMaiden
06-16-2006, 04:41 AM
There were good points that scientology had to offer, I wouldn't refute that at all. Since I had extensive dealings and involvement with scientology, I would say my biggest criticism is the amount of money it costs to become what is known as the clear state. I don't believe that I have to spend forty thousand dollars and up to a hundred thousand dollars to become immortal or a operating level 8 thetan. I also did not like the hypocrisy that seemed to stem from their wanting to live a 'clean healthy' life, but because it was okay that LRon Hubbard was a chain smoker, they could emulate his lifestyle and then claim since they were operating thetans, smoking wouldn't harm them.


I am sure that every scientology center is somewhat different. The one I attended was one of the largest and the most powerful in California, with many members and a big financial base of wealthy people in the Silicon Valley.


Their strong points include a highly detailed organizational system for business...how to keep the business ( of any kind) functioning, making money, and keeping workers highly motivated. They were efficient and were positive people as a whole.



The three people who got me involved in scientology were very wealthy, so money was not an objection to them and they were very good, encouraging people. But as I said, the disturbing part about scientology was how it attempted to somehow de-humanize human emotions. I found many of them to be shells of people rather than whole people.



Ephinie, to answer your question from my experience, and I hope to hear Dude's as well, they are actually pretty family oriented. In fact the first thing most scientologists will say is that they love children. Most of them were married with kids, a handful were single, but they didn't prejudice themselves against anyone who was childless/childfree or unmarried. However, if you said you disliked children generally they would see that as a negative state of mind, and that someone who had an interest in children and loved kids was probably a lot more emotionally healthy. I disagree with that. I don't hate kids but I don't consider myself one to be a parent. If you know you don't want kids, you should not have them.

LifeMaiden
06-16-2006, 04:49 AM
A quiet birth is good for a child. But (from http://faq.scientology.org.uk/news/quietbirth.htm ):

Does this mean that a mother cannot scream or moan at all?

Of course they can make noises — the point of silent birth is NO WORDS. This is a principle of Dianetics and to fully understand why, read the book Dianetics the Modern Science of Mental Health, by L. Ron Hubbard. It is words that are the culprit. Outside of not speaking, the objective is generally to have as peaceful and relaxing an environment as possible for the mother and child. It is doubtful that any woman could give birth without making any noise at all.

Mothers naturally want to give their baby the best possible start in life and thus keep the birth as quiet as possible.

Does the application of these principles preclude a mother from using medicines?

The Church has no policy against the use of medicines to help a person with a physical situation. This, too, is up to the mother and her doctor.

Scientologists recommended that a woman be CLEAR before she gives birth so she doesn't pass any emotional contamination onto the child.


Most scientologists where I was at ( known as The Org LOL) discouraged the use of medicines and hospitals when illnesses occurred. They preferred the use of vitamins, especially when you did the purification program in the spa, and had to take cupfuls of vitamins and especially a supplement called NIACIN. and


From my experience, Scientologists believe that illnesses were often psychosomatic, in other words, people who were CLEAR and beyond CLEAR, those who became operating Thetans, were not supposed to get sick. But many of them did. I didn't see any difference in health between those who claimed to be the highest operating levels and those like myself who hadn't even reached CLEAR. They would often let symptoms really get bad before seeking out medical help.

Now I am not one to pop pills or medications like candy, but I also believe if you have to go to the doctor, you better go, and not rely on a bunch of vitamins to help you out if you have an illness that isn't getting better.

dude
06-16-2006, 06:51 AM
Dude, I was wondering how long you've been a scientologist and if anyone else in your family are scientologists as well. There are some religions, like the Mormons for example, who place a very high value on healthy family relationships and family values. Do you find that Scientology is very family-oriented or more single-person oriented?
Scientology is pretty Utilitarian. You are important, your family are important, your friends are important, your area is important, your country is important, the world is important etc. In Scientology we call these dynamics - you need to take them all into account when looking at the best solution.

dude
06-16-2006, 07:06 AM
IceMaiden - this is my only post to you. I am not interested in discussing this with you. From your first post you start off misrepresenting Scientology. All your posts show a complete lack of understanding of what Scientology actually is. So many misunderstandings one has to wonder whether you're just not good at grasping things or whether you actively want to attack Scientology.
I'll just take the first post as an illustration:
I'm off to bed now but will tell you in greater detail and depth about this so-called religious cult. They considered themselves a religion with LRON HUBBARD as a god of sorts...and so on.
You've called Scientology a cult - misrepresentation.
2nd misrepresentation is the idea that Scientologists view LRH as a god.

Brian Wilson, also an Oxford scholar has some good stuff to say about apostates (ex-members):

http://www.neuereligion.de/ENG/Wilson/

"Neither the objective sociological researcher nor the court of law can readily regard the apostate as a creditable or reliable source of evidence. He must always be seen as one whose personal history predisposes him to bias with respect to both his previous religious commitment and affiliations, the suspicion must arise that he acts from a personal motivation to vindicate himself and to regain his self-esteem, by showing himself to have been first a victim but subsequently to have become a redeemed crusader. As various instances have indicated, he is likely to be suggestible and ready to enlarge or embellish his grievances to satisfy that species of journalist whose interest is more in sensational copy than in a objective statement of the truth. "

LifeMaiden
06-16-2006, 09:09 AM
I'm not going to sit here and argue with you any more than you're going to present a set of 'facts' to me that I've experienced through nearly two years in Scientology. It IS a cult more than a religion, and if it a religion as you say, then it's one of the false ones. More importantly, did you ever read the book on LRON HUBBARD, which was available only in Canada because scientologists made a big stink about this biography being sold here in America, afraid of what it would expose other scientologists to, the true nature of LRon Hubbard as a greedy self-centered jerk, and his wife, in jail to this day for income tax invasion? Did you read that book, written by a high-ranking ex-scientologist with the operating level theta 3? Of course you probably didn't...because the book would have never found its way to the US or to the UK.

Funny isn't it how when a person decides to get OUT of scientology, the first words that are used against her or him is 'misrepresenting' scientology as a cult. There's always an 'answer' to everything when a person leaves the group..i.e. what you posted below regarding apostates by Brian Wilson. And when one decides to leave, other scientologists follow the person home, try to come to their door for their lost progeny, spy on that person such as the cars which used to daily park across the street from my parents' home and sit there trying to see when and how often I came out of my house....instead of just accepting that I left the cult and they lost a potential 'big spender' member. They were more interested in my father's bank account and spending 40000 up front than they were in my own spiritual wellness.


And don't even try to get condescending with me and attempt to tell me I'm not good at grasping things LOL. If I had a hard time grasping things I doubt whether I would have skipped a grade, gotten a 155 on my IQ test, or gotten a 3.95 in college....when you've just wasted your forty thousand or more so you could become 'immortal' on your way up to an operating thetan. Tell me, do you have plans to reach OT 8? For another 100,000?


Your response is, and was typical, of all the scientologists that I encounted at my org when I decided I no longer wanted to be a part of that cult. You know how it is. When you decide to leave a cult, they basically think there's something wrong with 'you' and not the rest of the group. And yeah, I actively am attacking scientology while pointing out a 'few' of its better ideas. Oh yes, I should add that scientologists actively discourage people from going to college or getting a higher education because they might....hmmmm....want to keep their members unexposed to other realms of thought?

I remember when I was going to go and join that ship of operating THETANS and quit college. They were so overjoyed that I was quitting college, considering college, along with psychology and psychiatry to be so evil that I wondered if that was the real reason that clapped and cheered that day. Not so much that I had decided I would put on a cute naval uniform and sail around the world as a OT, but because they villified college.


But by all means, since scientology supposedly contains all the secrets of the universe, emphasizes past lives going back millions of years, charges people a donation fee of 40,000-100,000 to 'set themselves free and Clear, and later to become a fully operating thetan', Dude, I wish you well in your quest to find immortality, which can be found a lot simpler in the relationship you could have with God. Scientology taught me that I WAS a god. Unfortunately, I tend to disagree with that just as I do with experiencing past lives on the planet ZeeBopp back in 1 million BC or whatever.

LifeMaiden
06-16-2006, 09:19 AM
Thanks - it's a fascinating and useful subject! I was an atheist until two and a half years ago. I've only been in Scientology 2 years but I have read and listened to a lot of LRH's work and am nearly "Clear".


And how much have you spent so far? 16 years ago, the price or er...donation...was 40,000 to reach clear.

inkspot
06-16-2006, 10:33 AM
Dude, we're so glad to have a practicing Scientologist here to tell us about the religion.

I would ask you not to discount IceMaiden's experience simply because she left the church. By that reasoning, you would have to believe that there are no cults -- because people who are still in the cult would not say anything bad about the cult, do you see? And so who would you trust to give a witness about the cult: people who are in it and not allowed to say a bad word about it, or people who have left it? No one else would know any of the facts ... Your source says of the "apostate":
He must always be seen as one whose personal history predisposes him to bias with respect to both his previous religious commitment and affiliations But the same is true of the true believer, yes? Someone devoted to the faith is going to be predisposed to be biased in its favor. Neither can really be said to be creditable by that standard, right?

I am not saying your faith is a cult, but I don't think you can discount the experience of former members simply because they are former members.

The purpose of these Threads is really explanation and debate, not necessaruly just a fan club for the topic, so be prepared for opposing viewpoints. You can state the facts and give your documentation, but please don't assume no one else knows what they're talking about. Thanks!

LifeMaiden
06-16-2006, 10:41 AM
Thank you Inkspot for remaining polite as you always do :)

I did not state that ALL of scientology's premises and beliefs were bad. In fact 'bad' is not a word I would use. When someone no longer was a scientologist and left the cult, none of the other members were allowed to talk to them any longer, and they sent 'spies' out to my parents' home to keep an eye on me, which I felt was truly disturbing. If they were the accepting people they claimed to be, they would have let me leave peacefully and without hostility. The people who got me involved no longer spoke to me either, and that was a real shame, because I think the real fear was that the person who left the cult was going to tell others 'not to join.'

In my case, my negative perceptions of scientology came largely AFTER I had left...because when you're friends with a group of people you genuinely like, and suddenly you decide to leave and they turn their backs on you...that's pretty harsh in my opinion. I left the Catholic Church and my Catholic friends never did that...in fact they wanted me to come back for years.


The discounting of former members, Inkspot, is just that...their views and opinions of their former cult is discounted because they're no longer scientologists.

echoscot
06-16-2006, 05:16 PM
IceMaiden

You are truly a woman of many surprises. You have had such an array of cultural experiences, I am amazed. My mind would be whirling with all of the philosophies and ideas and creeds that different groups try to indoctrinate their people with.

Personally, I'll stick with the "Jesus Cult", the only price of admission is one life. And that has already been cleared with the doorman. :D

This is quite the exciting little thread, though.

Remember when we thought the abortion thread had dried up?LOL

LifeMaiden
06-16-2006, 11:43 PM
I can live with some of the inconsistencies that scientology offered, because nowhere did I state that its entirety was negative. What I don't like the most is the way they try to attack someone who has chosen to leave their group. If they have nothing to hide, then why should they be afraid of someone who leaves the group and attempt to make that person feel or look as if he/she is 'discrediting' the group? What's wrong with a person saying they left because they disagreed with some of the notions scientology had to offer?


I make it a point to question everything, even Christianity, as many of you know. I don't think anyone should accept something blindly. What annoyed me in scientology was their vague or hypocritical answers and their prejudice towards psychotherapy or psychiatry. I don't believe that every single person on this earth can have their mental or emotional problems erased by being 'CLEAR'. Mental disorders, depression, etc...are scientifically known to be caused by BIOLOGICAL brain chemical imbalances that CAN be helped by cognitive therapy, but not always with just therapy alone. I don't agree with everything psychiatrists do either, especially in the past, but I don't condemn them for the help they do give many patients.


There should be NO reason why the scientology org sent out people to spy on my parents house by driving by, sitting there across the street in a parked car, or immediately turning their backs on me by accusing me of trying to discredit them. If they have nothing to be discredited of, and nothing to hide, then they shouldn't worry about whether a member decides to leave or not, and simply say, " We're sorry to see you go, but good luck to you...." Rather than, " Okay, we don't want to have anything to do with you again, and the reason you're leaving is because you're under the influence of anti-scientologists and therefore, are going to attempt to discredit us."


When I asked questions, I was often met with very vague answers. Such as

" Where is Mrs. LRon Hubbard?"

"She's around somewhere." ( yes, in a Tennessee federal penitentiary for federal income tax evasion in the millions)


" How come you guys place such a big emphasis on your health and clearing the body of toxins but many of you are chain smokers?"


" Because we're clear or OT, our bodies won't get cancer." ( Ok, well, let's not forget LRonHubbard himself smoked 4 packs a day)

Lawrence
06-17-2006, 01:40 AM
"Brian Wilson, also an Oxford scholar has some good stuff to say about apostates (ex-members)..."

There is no need to drag everyone's favorite Beach Boy into this discussion.

But seriously, folks, very good discussion and extremely well mannered interchange on Scientology. I couldn't sleep one night and decided to read everything on Wikipedia about Scientology. After Mormonism, of which I am somewhat familiar, the theology of Scientology has to be some of the most complicated (and by that I mean convoluted) stuff I have ever come across. The different epochs, Xenu, a billion year this and a thousand year that, it made my head spin. But, I did attempt to read about the group and not rely on what our friends in Big Media would let us know about Tom, John, Kirstie and the like.

IceMaiden's experiences are extremely similar to many others who have written about leaving that particular group.

Pax,
L

Ephinie
06-17-2006, 03:46 AM
dude, in all of my experiences with IceMaiden, she has never given me the impression of a person who either has trouble assimilating information or forms biases without good cause. I am sure it was not your intention, but the post to her sounded unduly harsh. What inkspot said was very accurate. People who have left will have their biases, but people who are members of something will also be favorably inclined toward it. Believing in something and being favorably inclined toward something is a bias just as much as disagreeing with something.

That said, I value your input. You seem to be the only Scientologist who is currently in Scientology on here, so your thoughts are invaluable.

Couple questions: In your experience with Scientology, do people in your group smoke? You may have said this or not before, but I don't remember... have you ever been a part of another religion before you joined Scientology? And finally, are all the basic doctrines that you adhere to found in Hubbard's books, or are there some things that Scientologists have come up with apart from his orginal works?

LifeMaiden
06-17-2006, 04:52 AM
There was a lot of space age things in scientology that I was unable to 'grasp' just because it was too far out. Another interesting tidbit is that L Ron Hubbard's book Dianetics was a big bestseller, but wealthy scientologists purchased huge numbers of his science fiction works, which were actually not as popular as they seemed to be. There was a big emphasis on past lives as well.

I did enjoy the purification program, because that was what got me into working out and fitness. I do believe in the body detoxification idea to an extent...although our liver pretty much gets rid of a lot of wastes and toxins, there was something refreshing about sweating it out in a sauna and taking vitamins...although it was a bit extreme sitting in there for four hours and taking a cup of vitamins a day at one point ( which I threw out...I only took a few supplements). But you had to jog and exercise before getting into the sauna, which really helped me start a workout program after that. I started running more and more.

It's like I said...there were aspects of it which I did enjoy and which I felt were beneficial..but ultimately, I simply do not believe that one needs to pay so much money to get healthy or mentally clear.

echoscot
06-18-2006, 04:42 PM
I can live with some of the inconsistencies that scientology offered, because nowhere did I state that its entirety was negative. What I don't like the most is the way they try to attack someone who has chosen to leave their group. If they have nothing to hide, then why should they be afraid of someone who leaves the group and attempt to make that person feel or look as if he/she is 'discrediting' the group? What's wrong with a person saying they left because they disagreed with some of the notions scientology had to offer?


I make it a point to question everything, even Christianity, as many of you know. I don't think anyone should accept something blindly. What annoyed me in scientology was their vague or hypocritical answers and their prejudice towards psychotherapy or psychiatry. I don't believe that every single person on this earth can have their mental or emotional problems erased by being 'CLEAR'. Mental disorders, depression, etc...are scientifically known to be caused by BIOLOGICAL brain chemical imbalances that CAN be helped by cognitive therapy, but not always with just therapy alone. I don't agree with everything psychiatrists do either, especially in the past, but I don't condemn them for the help they do give many patients.


There should be NO reason why the scientology org sent out people to spy on my parents house by driving by, sitting there across the street in a parked car, or immediately turning their backs on me by accusing me of trying to discredit them. If they have nothing to be discredited of, and nothing to hide, then they shouldn't worry about whether a member decides to leave or not, and simply say, " We're sorry to see you go, but good luck to you...." Rather than, " Okay, we don't want to have anything to do with you again, and the reason you're leaving is because you're under the influence of anti-scientologists and therefore, are going to attempt to discredit us."


When I asked questions, I was often met with very vague answers. Such as

" Where is Mrs. LRon Hubbard?"

"She's around somewhere." ( yes, in a Tennessee federal penitentiary for federal income tax evasion in the millions)


" How come you guys place such a big emphasis on your health and clearing the body of toxins but many of you are chain smokers?"


" Because we're clear or OT, our bodies won't get cancer." ( Ok, well, let's not forget LRonHubbard himself smoked 4 packs a day)


I hope you didn't misinterpret my last post, It was meant to be complimentary.

LifeMaiden
06-18-2006, 07:01 PM
Oh no Echoscot I was just replying to in general how I felt about scientology :D No misinterpretation here at all.

dude
06-19-2006, 04:19 AM
Dude, we're so glad to have a practicing Scientologist here to tell us about the religion.

I would ask you not to discount IceMaiden's experience simply because she left the church.
I understand why you think this and you can rest assured I've done a lot of research into the subject. However she is spreading disinformation about Scientology - it's not just a case of "well i didn't find it useful for myself'.

If someone leaves Christianity they'll often be prone to spread their own mis-understanding around. The difference is that Christianity is so big and so common that few people are going to believe you if you spread ridiculous rumours about it.

Then there is the fact that Scientology is a workable philosophy- it's not merely theoretical. In my opinion someone who didn't get something to work is less capable than someone who did in any field.

I do understand why you'd find IceMaiden plausible though - I would too if I hadn't got so much experience with Scientology.

dude
06-19-2006, 04:45 AM
dude, in all of my experiences with IceMaiden, she has never given me the impression of a person who either has trouble assimilating information or forms biases without good cause. I am sure it was not your intention, but the post to her sounded unduly harsh.
Couple questions: In your experience with Scientology, do people in your group smoke? You may have said this or not before, but I don't remember... have you ever been a part of another religion before you joined Scientology? And finally, are all the basic doctrines that you adhere to found in Hubbard's books, or are there some things that Scientologists have come up with apart from his orginal works?
I understand your opinion about IceMaiden. On the other hand I know she is spreading misinformation.

I've not really been a part of another religion before Scientology. I did read up on Buddhism and Christianity when I was trying to work out what our spiritual nature is.

Some Scientologists smoke, some eat chocolate and some drink coffee too. If it's not done in moderation then something is wrong though. Smoking's not very healthy but it doesn't have much affect on your mind.

Hubbard did a lot of research and there are still techniques he developed that haven't been released yet as delivery is still being prepared. So new research isn't the main priority - it's getting people to do the existing techniques so we can make this a saner planet.

Ephinie
06-19-2006, 05:01 AM
dude, thanks for answering my questions! I have another:

Based on your experience with Scientology, how well does it mesh with other religions? Like, do you know any Scientologists who practise both that and Christianity... or both Scientology and Islam... or both Scientology along with any other religion? Also, does Scientology make any statements about other religions in general, such as how accurate or not their beliefs are? Most religions generally view other religions as false.

LifeMaiden
06-19-2006, 07:20 AM
I understand your opinion about IceMaiden. On the other hand I know she is spreading misinformation.

I've not really been a part of another religion before Scientology. I did read up on Buddhism and Christianity when I was trying to work out what our spiritual nature is.

Some Scientologists smoke, some eat chocolate and some drink coffee too. If it's not done in moderation then something is wrong though. Smoking's not very healthy but it doesn't have much affect on your mind.

Hubbard did a lot of research and there are still techniques he developed that haven't been released yet as delivery is still being prepared. So new research isn't the main priority - it's getting people to do the existing techniques so we can make this a saner planet.

Smoking's not healthy but it won't affect your mind...how about the lungs and the body? This is the kind of so called cult mentality that permeates this group. Funny, I'm, starting to remmeber a lot of words that scientologists would use around others who either were not in the group or decided to leave. Such as spreading MISINFORMATION...doesn't that sound like a strange thing say?
And this where you are simply wrong. Spreading 'misinformation' was something that was used almost like some kind of codekey word. "


AHHHH yes the SANER planet...what a joke. The goal is to make as many people get into scientology to make the world 'sane'...a LRonHubbard utopia.

dude
06-19-2006, 07:28 AM
It depends on your interpretations of other religions I think.
I think Scientology and Buddhism are most compatible. I know several Christian Scientologists but there are many different types of Christian too - some state you can't be a Christian if you believe in reincarnation and so on.

Scientology is about techniques and not really faith so there is room for Christians using the techniques while having their own ideas about God.

Ephinie
06-19-2006, 07:29 AM
Well... really, to speak specifically to the statement that smoking is unhealthy but won't affect the mind, I actually have to disagree with that. Smoking creates an addiction, and addictions most certainly do affect the mind.

dude
06-19-2006, 07:31 AM
Also, does Scientology make any statements about other religions in general, such as how accurate or not their beliefs are? Most religions generally view other religions as false.
Scientologists practice religious tolerance and don't go around trying to invalidate others based on their beliefs. Everyone has a right to believe in what they want as long as they don't use their beliefs to harm others.

dude
06-19-2006, 07:37 AM
Well... really, to speak specifically to the statement that smoking is unhealthy but won't affect the mind, I actually have to disagree with that. Smoking creates an addiction, and addictions most certainly do affect the mind.

Well if you can't sit still for several hours without thinking about cigarettes then your smoking is definitely a problem to you as a Scientologist. To be more precise nicotine (and caffeine) don't have any significant affect on your ability to create mental image pictures. Similarly nicotine doesn't really have detrimental on your ability to say drive a car - that's why you're allowed to have it in your system when driving.

PrinceOfTheWest
06-19-2006, 07:42 AM
It's a stretch to say that one could be a Scientologist and a Christian. A Scientologist may believe that, but no educated Christian would. The two systems have totally incompatible understandings of human nature, of the nature of sin, and (mostly) the nature of redemption. Someone may think they could adhere to the teachings of Scientology and still follow the external cultural forms of Christianity, but I'd submit such a person is an uneducated Christian.

I have this from my brother, who has rejected Christianity in favor of Scientology on the basis that the two are incompatible.

Ephinie
06-19-2006, 07:47 AM
It's a stretch to say that one could be a Scientologist and a Christian. A Scientologist may believe that, but no educated Christian would. The two systems have totally incompatible understandings of human nature, of the nature of sin, and (mostly) the nature of redemption. Someone may think they could adhere to the teachings of Scientology and still follow the external cultural forms of Christianity, but I'd submit such a person is an uneducated Christian.

I have this from my brother, who has rejected Christianity in favor of Scientology on the basis that the two are incompatible.From my own, Christian perspective, I can say pretty easily that Scientology and Christianity are incompatible. But what I was asking for more specifically was whether that could be said from the Scientologist's perspective as well. Sounds like your brother's decision answers that. Thank you.

LifeMaiden
06-19-2006, 07:53 AM
It depends on your interpretations of other religions I think.
I think Scientology and Buddhism are most compatible. I know several Christian Scientologists but there are many different types of Christian too - some state you can't be a Christian if you believe in reincarnation and so on.

Scientology is about techniques and not really faith so there is room for Christians using the techniques while having their own ideas about God.


Yes, that is true. I think I mentioned that in one of my older posts that I felt Scientology was more in common with the eastern faiths and the belief in past lives.

dude
06-19-2006, 08:02 AM
It's a stretch to say that one could be a Scientologist and a Christian. A Scientologist may believe that, but no educated Christian would. The two systems have totally incompatible understandings of human nature, of the nature of sin, and (mostly) the nature of redemption.
Well I still think you can fit them together pretty well if you want.
For example sin comes about because of becoming too divorced from your spiritual nature (or God) and redemption involves confronting your sin learning from it and moving back towards God.
If you're not a Scientologist and a Christian you probably wouldn't bother fitting them together though.

Ephinie
06-19-2006, 08:08 AM
For example sin comes about because of becoming too divorced from your spiritual nature (or God) and redemption involves confronting your sin learning from it and moving back towards God.
I don't know about that one... from the Christian perspective, redemption comes from Christ's sacrifice on the cross. It doesn't actually have anything to do with our own effort or own learning or understanding.

dude
06-19-2006, 08:22 AM
yeah - but you could view our time on earth as being something we need to do in order to develop spiritually or understand God better, or experience unconditional love.

it's not like christ died on the cross so we can rape and murder whoever we feel like.